The notes are the working record of this project.
A note may be a single roast log, a comparison between roasts, a calibration update, a reflection on something the machine did, or a correction to earlier thinking. They are not fixed. They show the learning as it happened.
Some older notes reflect what I understood at the time. Later roasts may refine or correct those ideas.
Good places to start
- Roast 91 and Roast 92 — Same Plan, Different Result
- Roasts 84 to 91 — Stabilising the Current Heater
- Roast 70–75 — The Repaired Gene Café Has a Different Fingerprint
- Roast 36 & 37 — Cold vs Hot Start Behaviour
Key groups within the notes
Post-repair recalibration
These notes track how the machine behaved after a heater repair in 2026 and why I became more cautious about repeatability claims. Start with Roast 70–75.
Repeatability checks
These notes ask whether similar plans produce similar outcomes. The short answer is: sometimes, and the exceptions are usually informative.
Cold vs warm start behaviour
One of the most consistent variables across all roasts. Roasts 36/37 and 39/40 document this most clearly.
Reference roasts
A small number of roasts used as practical anchors for comparison. Roast 8 (Brazil Topazio) is the most frequently referenced upper-bound example.
-
Roast 35 – Kenyan AA Natural (Wanted) – Oven Hood Ventilation Calibration
-
Roast 34 – Kenyan AA Natural (Wanted) | First Roast with Oven Hood Ventilation
-
System Reflection — Thermal Memory on the Gene Café CBR-301 Is Not Subtle
-
Cold vs Warm Start | TRT Discipline | Upper Guardrail Defined
-
Brazil Santos Natural — Gene Café CBR-301 Sequential Heat Saturation Session
-
Brazil Santos Natural | 250g → 207.4g (17.0% WL) | TRT Validation (Airflow Inflection)
-
Roast 26 – Brazil Santos (Natural) | TRT Push Upper Boundary
-
Note – Roast 25 | When Time Wasn’t Enough
-
Note – On Repeatability, Correlation, and the Urge to Overcomplicate
-
Sample Roast 3 – Regional Jess (Huila, Washed Blend)