The notes are the working record of this project.
A note may be a single roast log, a comparison between roasts, a calibration update, a reflection on something the machine did, or a correction to earlier thinking. They are not fixed. They show the learning as it happened.
Some older notes reflect what I understood at the time. Later roasts may refine or correct those ideas.
Good places to start
- Roast 91 and Roast 92 — Same Plan, Different Result
- Roasts 84 to 91 — Stabilising the Current Heater
- Roast 70–75 — The Repaired Gene Café Has a Different Fingerprint
- Roast 36 & 37 — Cold vs Hot Start Behaviour
Key groups within the notes
Post-repair recalibration
These notes track how the machine behaved after a heater repair in 2026 and why I became more cautious about repeatability claims. Start with Roast 70–75.
Repeatability checks
These notes ask whether similar plans produce similar outcomes. The short answer is: sometimes, and the exceptions are usually informative.
Cold vs warm start behaviour
One of the most consistent variables across all roasts. Roasts 36/37 and 39/40 document this most clearly.
Reference roasts
A small number of roasts used as practical anchors for comparison. Roast 8 (Brazil Topazio) is the most frequently referenced upper-bound example.
-
Four Roasts on the Restored Heater: What I Think the Gene Café CBR-301 Is Doing Now
-
Roast 99 Note Draft
-
Roasts 95–97 – Three Honduras Field Notes and a Quiet 100th Roast Event
-
Would I Still Recommend the Gene Café CBR-301 After 100 Roasts?
-
Roast 93 and 94 – End-of-Bag Personal Roasts
-
Roast 91 and Roast 92 — Same Plan, Different Result
-
Roasts 84 to 91 – Stabilising the Current Heater, Not Pretending It Is Normal
-
Roast 80–83 – Control Inputs vs Outcome (Honduras, Washed)
-
Post-Heater Recalibration, What Actually Changed
-
Roast 70–75, The Repaired Gene Café Has a Different Fingerprint