250 g batches | 250°C set | 4 consecutive roasts

Objective

To test:

  1. How the Gene Café CBR-301 behaves across multiple back-to-back 250 g roasts.
  2. Whether cooling to 60°C fully resets the machine.
  3. How start temperature affects:
    • Time to 200°C
    • Time to 230°C
    • Total roast time (TRT)
    • Final weight loss %

This was a system experiment, not a flavour experiment.

All roasts were Brazil Santos Natural, 250 g input, target temperature 250°C.

Cooling cycles were allowed to complete to 60°C between batches in line with manufacturer expectations.


Measured Data Summary

RoastStart Temp200°C230°CCool TimeWeight OutWL %
28~21°C (cold start)4:107:0913:10210.5 g15.8%
29~61°C3:006:00~12:xx210.9 g15.6%
30~63°C3:026:0412:45208.1 g16.8%
31~63°C3:076:1012:30209.8 g16.1%

Ambient room temperature: ~20–21°C.


Core Observations

1. Cooling to 60°C Does Not Reset the Machine

Despite running full cooling cycles:

  • Roast 28 (true cold start) reached 200°C at 4:10.
  • Roasts 29–31 reached 200°C around 3:00.

That is a ~60–70 second acceleration.

Conclusion:

The Gene Café retains significant internal heat mass even after cooling to 60°C.

The machine is operationally safe at 60°C — but thermally not equivalent to ambient.

This is a behavioural characteristic, not a flaw.


2. Early Phase Compression Is Real

Hot-start roasts showed:

  • Faster climb to 200°C.
  • Faster climb to 230°C.
  • Earlier fan shift behaviour.
  • More aggressive early energy delivery.

This compresses:

  • Drying phase
  • Early Maillard entry

Without changing the programmed set temperature.

Conclusion:

Machine thermal state materially alters roast curve shape even when inputs are identical.


3. Total Roast Time Becomes Less Predictable Under Heat Saturation

Cold start:

  • 13:10 → 15.8% WL

Hot machine:

  • 12:45 → 16.8%
  • 12:30 → 16.1%

Shorter time.
Higher weight loss.

This confirms:

TRT alone is not a stable proxy for roast level when machine start temperature varies.

Weight loss remains the primary validation metric.


4. Santos Responds Cleanly to Energy Front-Loading

Across the 15.6%–16.8% range:

  • No oil spots.
  • No visible scorching.
  • No erratic behaviour.
  • No clear instability.

The bean appears structurally tolerant in the 15–16.5% band.

This is useful for both personal preference mapping and “friend roast” targeting.


5. Dynamic TRT Guardrail Established

From this session:

Cold Start (Ambient Machine)

If:

  • 200°C ~4:00–4:15
    Then:
  • ~13:00–13:10 = 15.8–16%

Hot Machine

If:

  • 200°C ~3:00–3:10
    Then:
  • 12:30–12:45 = ~16–16.8%

This becomes an operational rule:

Adjust TRT based on 200°C milestone timing.

If 200°C arrives early, you must shorten total time accordingly.

This is now a working field guardrail.


Structural Mapping Context

Within the broader Santos arc:

  • ~15.0–15.5% → Acid-forward, thin, slightly green perception.
  • ~16.0% → Target comfort zone candidate.
  • ~17% → Upper boundary risk region.

This session intentionally populated the 15.6–16.8% band.

That gives a proper structural ladder:

15.6 → 15.8 → 16.1 → 16.8

Clean. Sequential. Measured.


System Lessons (Project-Level)

  1. The Gene Café has thermal memory beyond visible cooling.
  2. Ambient + machine start temperature must be considered in any predictive model.
  3. TRT cannot be universal; it must be contextual.
  4. Weight loss remains the most reliable roast-level anchor.
  5. Sequential roasting is predictable — but not identical.
  6. Front-loaded energy increases effective development even when final time is shorter.
  7. Manufacturer cooling guidance can be followed while still producing valid experimental data.

What This Session Was

This was not:

  • Random roasting.
  • Chasing darker colour.
  • Trying to “fix” flavour.

This was:

A controlled heat-saturation experiment to understand system behaviour under sequential load.

And it worked.


Open Questions (For Tasting Phase)

  1. Does 16.1% represent the structural sweet spot?
  2. Is 16.8% fatiguing or simply rounder?
  3. Does body increase without introducing dryness?
  4. Does milk integration improve meaningfully above 16%?

Those are sensory questions.

This session answered the mechanical ones.


Final Conclusion

The most important takeaway is not which roast tastes best.

It is this:

The machine is predictable — but only when you account for its thermal state.