Context

Roast 27 was designed as a TRT (Total Roast Time) validation test.

The working assumption was:

Cooling at ~13:30 should consistently land near ~16% weight loss.

Roast 26 had previously landed at 16.2% using a 13:30 hard stop.

Roast 27 was intended to confirm whether TRT alone is a reliable operational control.


Parameters

  • Batch size: 250g
  • Set temperature: 250°C
  • No preheat
  • Cooling initiated: 13:31 (811 seconds)
  • Weight out: 207.4g
  • Weight loss: 17.0%
  • Ambient start temp: 23°C

No crack flag recorded.


Machine Behaviour (Corrected JSON)

Early Phase

  • Fan OFF → 2 at start
  • Fan 2 → 3 at 3:45 (225s)
  • Temperature at shift: 198°C

This fan transition occurred earlier than the established system median (~4:05–4:10) and at a lower bean temperature (~202°C is typical).

Fan remained at 3 for the remainder of the roast.


Temperature Milestones

  • 100°C → 0:51
  • 150°C → 1:53
  • 180°C → 2:53
  • 200°C → 3:49
  • 230°C → 7:04
  • 240°C → 8:59
  • 245°C → 9:47
  • 250°C → 11:12

Final phase was stable (≈247–249°C average in last minutes).
No oscillation or stall observed.


Observational Notes

  • Visibly darker than Roast 26 (16.2%)
  • Even development across batch
  • No surface oil observed at logging
  • Slightly more pronounced seam expansion
  • Colour saturation clearly deeper than 16.2% reference

This roast sits structurally above 16.2% and below the 17.8% Topazio upper guardrail reference.


Primary Outcome

13:30 TRT is not a precision WL control.

Roast 27 landed at 17.0% WL, despite matching total time from Roast 26.

The material difference appears to be:

Earlier fan 2 → 3 transition at 3:45 (198°C)

Compared to prior roasts, this represents:

  • ~20–30 seconds earlier airflow escalation
  • Occurring below the typical 200–202°C transition cluster

That earlier airflow shift likely altered the energy balance across the roast.


Structural Interpretation (Carefully Framed)

Earlier fan shift means:

  • Earlier increase in convective airflow
  • System compensates thermally
  • Drying phase pacing shifts slightly
  • Cumulative energy distribution changes

Even with identical TRT, the roast trajectory was not identical.

Conclusion:

Airflow timing is a primary structural variable on this system.

TRT functions as a ceiling — not a guaranteed WL target.


What This Roast Adds to the Santos Map

Current structural markers:

  • 15.0% — lower comfort band
  • 15.5% — mid comfort band
  • 16.2% — upper comfort
  • 17.0% — upper structural reference (Roast 27)

Roast 27 becomes the meaningful high-band Santos reference under current airflow behaviour.

It is not a mistake.
It is a data point.


Learning Summary

  1. Weight loss remains the primary anchor.
  2. TRT alone cannot guarantee WL precision.
  3. Fan transition timing materially influences outcome.
  4. Ambient temperature may influence early system behaviour.
  5. The Gene Café is consistent — but airflow timing changes matter.

Status

Resting prior to structured espresso comparison with Roast 26 (16.2%).

Roast 27 is designated as:

Upper structural reference for Brazil Santos under early fan-shift conditions.

Further evaluation pending espresso testing.